PIPELINE Information Hub

The PIPELINE Information Hub is a comprehensive resource centre dedicated to the safe, ethical, and effective inclusion of pregnant individuals and children in clinical research. We provide researchers, clinicians, and ethicists with the tools necessary to move from protecting through exclusion to protecting through evidence.

PIPELINE digest

Below is a curated list of clinical studies and peer-reviewed publications focused on the inclusion of pregnant individuals and infants in research. 

From clinical data and infant populations to key publications highlighting the need for their inclusion, these resources provide the evidence needed to bridge the gap in maternal and infant health research.

The MELODY Study

The MELODY study evaluated the efficacy of Nirsevimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody. Unlike a traditional vaccine that teaches the body to make its own antibodies, Nirsevimab provides “ready-made” passive immunity. 

  • Target: Healthy infants entering their first RSV season. 
  • Key Findings: A single dose reduced RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) by approximately 75%
  • Impact: Significant reduction in hospitalisations and emergency department visits. 

 

Supporting Evidence 

  • Nirsevimab Effectiveness: Recent real-world data and meta-analyses confirm its role in drastically cutting hospitalizations for RSV bronchiolitis.

 

Read the research: 

 

More on ClinicalTrials.gov

The MATISSE study explored the efficacy of a bivalent RSV prefusion F protein-based vaccine administered during pregnancy to protect the newborn from birth. 

  • Mechanism: Administered to mothers between the 24th and 36th week of gestation. The mother develops antibodies that are transferred across the placenta to the fetus. 
  • Efficacy: Found to be 81.8% effective in preventing severe RSV-related respiratory disease within the first 90 days of life. 
  • Durability: Protection remained high through the infant’s first six months. 

 

Supporting Evidence 

Research continues to monitor the safety and immunogenicity of maternal vaccines, ensuring optimal outcomes for both mother and child, including the monitoring of preterm birth rates. 

Read the research: 

 

More on ClinicalTrials.gov

Challenges of involving pregnant individuals in clinical research

  • Ethical Factors 
    Fear of teratogenic or fetal harm from experimental drugs, difficulty predicting risk/benefit ratios for both mother and fetus, and medical-legal liability concerns in case of adverse outcomes (e.g., malformations, preterm birth). Consent issues are particularly complex: newborns cannot provide consent, and proxy consent raises ethical debates. 
    (Ref: Moayad L et al., The Lancet, 2024; ACOG Committee Statement, 2024) 
  • Regulatory Factors 
    Restrictive interpretation of “minimal risk” and “direct benefit” requirements often limits trial design. Approval processes for vulnerable populations are complex and time-consuming, discouraging sponsors from pursuing these studies. 
    (Ref: Moayad L et al., The Lancet, 2024) 
  • Economic Factors 
    Low perceived profitability due to smaller population size compared to adults. Trials are more expensive because of intensive monitoring and safety requirements. Pharmaceutical companies are often reluctant to invest in specialized formulations for neonates, adding further cost barriers. 
    (Ref: Shankar M et al., PLoS Med, 2024) 
  • Scientific & Methodological Factors 
    Pregnancy alters pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (blood volume, metabolism, renal clearance), requiring different dosages and complex modeling. Variability across trimesters means larger and more stratified sample sizes. For infants, hepatic and renal immaturity complicates dose definition, and customized formulations (e.g., syrups, drops) increase costs and complexity. 
    (Ref: Shaikh H et al., JAMA Netw Open, 2024Bencheva V et al., Syst Rev, 2024) 
  • Sociocultural Factors 
    Reluctance of women and families to participate due to fear, mistrust, and cultural norms influencing decision-making and autonomy. These factors often intersect with socioeconomic barriers, further reducing enrollment rates. 
    (Ref: Shankar M et al., PLoS Med, 2024) 

Clinical data for pregnancy and infant health research

Access a curated collection of clinical studies, ongoing registries and foundational publications.

The CDR is a collaborative effort of the EU-funded projects VERDI  and CoMeCT which addresses the urgent need for efficient data management in the face of evolving infectious disease challenges. The CDR aims to minimise research duplication and accelerate the identification of key research infrastructures across Europe.

Access the CDR 

 

PIPELINE Podcast

Our podcast features in-depth conversations with leading researchers and clinicians. We explore the real-world challenges of trial design and the innovative solutions being used to close the evidence gap for pregnant populations and children. 

Episode 1 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. 

Episode 2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. 

Episode 3

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. 

Episode 4

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. 

PIPELINE Virtual Learning Centre (VLC)

From foundational ethics to advanced protocol design, our selection of training courses is designed to equip your team with actionable skills. These courses cover the regulatory requirements and practical steps needed to conduct safe and ethical research.

All suggested courses are in English and the majority are accessible online.

View PIPELINES curated list of courses.